Comparison of competing continuous casting process

$15.00

The authors will compare the SCR and Contirod processes in areas that include initial investment cost vs. rate of production tons per hour (or annual capacity); product defects and engineering solutions; surface quality of the rod made by SCR vs. Contirod; surface porosity defects and how to overcome them in a Hazelett casting system; internal wire core defects caused by casting flaws; technical and operational service and know-how for each process; unit cost to operate each casting and rolling system; and an advanced system to measure defects in real time

Description

The authors will compare the SCR and Contirod processes in areas that include initial investment cost vs. rate of production tons per hour (or annual capacity); product defects and engineering solutions; surface quality of the rod made by SCR vs. Contirod; surface porosity defects and how to overcome them in a Hazelett casting system; internal wire core defects caused by casting flaws; technical and operational service and know-how for each process; unit cost to operate each casting and rolling system; and an advanced system to measure defects in real time

Additional information

Author(s)

Joseph Meseha and George Meseha, Meseha Advanced Technologies LLC, USA.

Publication/Event/Pages

Paper presented at WAI 74th Annual Convention, Cleveland, OH USA. Published in WJI, March 2005.

Year

2004